1 00:00:00,580 --> 00:00:04,090 So here's a quick comparison of the different versions of Spending Tree. 2 00:00:04,450 --> 00:00:11,860 The spending tree A to one DX protocol doesn't need a lot of resources but is slow to converge. 3 00:00:12,100 --> 00:00:17,380 You only have one spanning tree instance for your entire layer to network. 4 00:00:17,860 --> 00:00:27,580 This can lead to suboptimal traffic flows and ADA 2 to 1 DX is generally not used today in Cisco environments. 5 00:00:27,910 --> 00:00:34,840 Just be aware that when you use newer versions of spanning tree Cisco switches or backward compatible 6 00:00:34,840 --> 00:00:43,840 and can talk to older switches or non Cisco switches using edited edit2 one DX PVS DT is the Cisco enhancement 7 00:00:43,840 --> 00:00:48,730 that provides a single instance of spending tree per VLAN. 8 00:00:48,910 --> 00:00:50,560 It's just a proprietary. 9 00:00:50,710 --> 00:00:56,260 It needs more resources because one spanning tree instance is created per VLAN. 10 00:00:56,440 --> 00:01:05,319 It is still slow to converge but does allow you to split traffic flows because you have one spanning 11 00:01:05,349 --> 00:01:06,910 tree instance per VLAN. 12 00:01:07,030 --> 00:01:14,590 As an example VLAN one traffic could use one uplink, but VLAN two traffic could use a separate uplink 13 00:01:14,590 --> 00:01:17,230 or a separate port in a network. 14 00:01:17,470 --> 00:01:19,860 Cisco have also enhanced PVS. 15 00:01:19,900 --> 00:01:28,390 RT with features such as Port Fast UpLink, Fast Backbone, Fast BPU, Guard, BPD, Filter, Root, 16 00:01:28,390 --> 00:01:29,980 guard and Loop Guard. 17 00:01:30,190 --> 00:01:33,400 We'll discuss some of those terms in this course. 18 00:01:33,520 --> 00:01:37,230 Otherwise, you'll learn more about those when you attend your camp. 19 00:01:37,240 --> 00:01:43,300 Course's rapids spanning tree protocol or ADA 2 to 1 W is an industry standard protocol. 20 00:01:43,330 --> 00:01:49,960 It doesn't need as many resources as PVS plus because it supports a single instance of spanning tree 21 00:01:49,960 --> 00:01:51,820 for your layer two network. 22 00:01:52,030 --> 00:01:57,010 Its big advantage is that it provides very quick or fast convergence. 23 00:01:57,490 --> 00:02:05,200 It also doesn't address suboptimal traffic flow issues because you can't send VLAN ten traffic for example 24 00:02:05,200 --> 00:02:09,039 down one link and VLAN 20 traffic down another link. 25 00:02:09,250 --> 00:02:12,100 That's the advantage of rapid PvP plus. 26 00:02:12,310 --> 00:02:19,960 Rapid PvP plus incorporates the advantages of rapid spanning tree, but allows you to create one spanning 27 00:02:19,990 --> 00:02:24,070 tree instance per VLAN so you can do load sharing of traffic. 28 00:02:24,400 --> 00:02:31,090 It provides a very quick convergence but uses a lot of resources, especially when you've got many VLANs. 29 00:02:31,570 --> 00:02:40,660 The advantage of multiple spanning tree is that it solves the high resource issue of PVP plus multiple 30 00:02:40,660 --> 00:02:40,960 spending. 31 00:02:40,990 --> 00:02:49,060 Tree allows you to create a instance of spanning tree and then map various VLANs to that instance. 32 00:02:49,540 --> 00:02:58,090 As an example, once again, if you had 200 VLANs, PvP or rapid PvP would require 200 instances of 33 00:02:58,090 --> 00:03:04,240 spanning tree, whereas multiple spanning tree could use two instances to do load sharing and reduce 34 00:03:04,240 --> 00:03:06,880 the amount of resources required. 35 00:03:07,120 --> 00:03:15,160 So CPU and memory requirements for multiple spanning tree are lower than those for rapid PVP plus, 36 00:03:15,160 --> 00:03:19,270 but resources are higher than those for rapid spanning tree. 37 00:03:19,720 --> 00:03:26,800 Now you may find reference materials stating that PvP plus is the default spanning tree on Cisco switches. 38 00:03:26,890 --> 00:03:28,270 That really depends. 39 00:03:28,270 --> 00:03:29,410 A lot of switches today. 40 00:03:29,410 --> 00:03:33,160 Use rapid PvP as the default version of spanning tree.