[Autogenerated] you might already be aware of some of the
benefits off implementing Dev SEC ops.
However,
wanting we must keep in mind when we're discussing Dave SEC ops is that DEP SEC
UPs is more about the culture at high degrees of collaboration and not solely
about specific tools or products that you implement.
So, for example, if you are a developer in an organization,
I want advanced the security controls around code that you create def.
SEC ops is definitely a good way forward for improving
the security posture of your code.
You may, of course, need to convince,
or at least discuss with your manager in terms of
implementing any new practices.
For the manager, there are definite benefits and implementing Dave SEC ops.
Also, if you're part of the I T.
Security organization,
you will really want to pursue some of the automated and
continue security checking that dev sec up Springs.
Maybe you're working in I T.
Operations, keeping all the systems running.
Or maybe you're just tired of dealing with security incidents.
In that case, they have SEC ups can really bring advantages to your workload.
If you already work within a dev UPS environment providing
automation between the development and the operations.
Part of solutions, then have SEC ups is a natural extension off that workload.
And finally,
if you're looking at managing the finance and cost
associate with software development,
you're definitely going to be interested in exploring the benefits of Dev.
SEC ups from cost efficiency.
Perspective.
One thing that all these different types of roles have in common is they're
all trying to look for a specific justification off Dave Sec ABS in order to
provide and build support for their initiatives.
So no matter what role you fit into thirds always benefits,
you can accrue from Dev SEC ops.
So where is they've SEC ups Most appropriate?
There is no hard and fast rule saying that you must have certain methodology
or life cycles in place before you can apply def sec up.
And likewise,
there is no hard and fast rule to say that you cannot
apply def SEC ops in certain environments.
However,
some general guidelines include where you have an agile
methodology is highly suitable to a def sec.
UPS deployment If you have existing Dave ups in place def sec,
Ups is a natural extension to this,
you may have some of the pipelines for deploying
your solutions already in place.
Extending those is going to be an incremental piece of work rather
than some fundamental shift in your processes.
If you're doing multiple releases per year per day or per hour,
deaf Cyclops is definitely appropriate to your environment.
If you have some automation already in place in your development lifecycle,
then you already have the railway tracks laid out,
and you can plug some of the def sec ups controls into this pipeline,
where you're working under a different type of structure
and using a waterfall methodology.
I'm not saying that you cannot deploy Debs heck ups in this environment,
but you may need to consider carefully how best to fit the
practices of Dave Sec up into that environment.
If you work in a highly regulated environment that requires significant changes,
toe any improvements are variation on the software development lifecycle.
Then this may not be suitable for Dev SEC ops.
If you're only doing one or two releases per year,
you may not get the payback that they have Cyclops promises.
So this is something you need to give careful consideration to And finally,
if you have no automation in place in your current environment,
I would recommend you start with building out some
automation and starting with the building block of
develops before you look to move into Dev.
SEC ups.
I'm not saying that it's not possible to undertake def sec ups
with the environments listed under right,
but there are other considerations you need to factor in in doing so.